Video Competition

Call for Participation

Please enter the ASEE Community Engagement Division 2022 Video Competition

Do you have an engineering community engagement story to tell? ASEE CED would like to announce its third video competition and encourage all to consider participating. The goal is to recognize outstanding efforts and promote high-quality meaningful communion in the field of engineering community engagement.

Entries must be submitted HERE by March 31st, 2022, which consists of completing a short online form, including pasting a link to your published YouTube video. Winners will be announced at the 2022 ASEE national conference.

CED Video Competition Prize

The competition will award a single winning video the title of Best Engagement Video along with a $500 prize. The videos will be evaluated by the team of judges using the competition’s rubric below. The video with the highest combined score will be the winner. This competition will be judged by a panel of senior community engagement practitioners and researchers.

CED Video Competition Minimum Requirements

Video Content

  • The length of the video must be between 3 and 5 minutes, including any opening title information and closing credits.
  • All videos must be original and appropriate for a general audience.
  • Videos must comply with copyright rules and regulations. Sources of information and materials used (i.e. music) must be properly acknowledged and credited in the video.

Video Format

  • Videos are to be uploaded publicly to YouTube. The link and permission for ASEE CED to use this video shall be provided in the competition submission form.
  • Resolution minimum of 720p

Team and Institution

  • At least one video project team member must be an ASEE member. An ASEE member must be the one to complete the competition submission form.
  • Team members, any affiliated educational institution, and partnering organizations should be acknowledged in the video.

Other Information

  • Identify the intended audience and main message for this video in the competition submission form.
  • Certification by the applicant in the competition submission form that: All partners (or their representative) mentioned in this video have viewed the final form of this video, endorsed its message, and approved of it being released for use in this ASEE CED video competition.
  • Certification by the applicant in the competition submission form that: All persons in this video have signed model release forms appropriate to this effort.

 

ASEE Community Engagement Division 2022 Video Competition Rubric
Category Best Engagement Video Weight Excellent (5 pt) Good (3 pt) Adequate (1 pt) Inadequate (0 pt)
Messaging 0.30 Viewer is left with a strong understanding of the message, will remember the video, and feels like they want to learn/do more. The message itself generates outstanding value for engineering community engagement stakeholders at large. Viewer is left with a general understanding of the message and will remember the video. The message itself generates good value for engineering community engagement stakeholders at large. Viewer mostly understands the message and might remember the video. Some introduced themes/topics may distract from the message. The message itself generates some value for engineering community engagement stakeholders at large. Presentation is unclear on the message and unmemorable. The message itself generates little value for engineering community engagement stakeholders at large.
Best Practices 0.40 The video exemplifies and communicates best practices in engineering community engagement in an outstanding manner. These may include incorporation of reflection, reciprocity between partners (which may include partner participation in the video itself), and so on. The video exemplifies and communicates best practices in engineering community engagement. The video somewhat reflects best practices in engineering community engagement. The video does not exemplify or communicate best practices in engineering community engagement.
Creativity 0.10 The video effectively uses unique and original methods to express the message and engage the viewer. The video uses traditional methods for telling the story but does include some unique elements throughout the video that effectively engage the viewer. The video uses a unique method to express the message, but the method(s) overshadow the message, leaving the viewer confused or unclear on the video’s purpose. The entire video only uses a very traditional manner to present their message and does not include any creative elements that engage the viewer.
Production 0.20 Video is well planned and shot, with smooth transitions and edits. Sound is expertly balanced and easy to hear. All sound and visual elements coincide with the video’s message. All titles and credits were
accurate, legible, and caught the viewer’s attention.
Video is well planned and shot, with competent edits. Sound is well balanced and easy to hear. Most sound and visual elements blend with the video’s message. All the titles and credits were accurate, but some were not legible or did not catch the viewer’s attention. Video was somewhat planned. Transitions and edits are rudimentary. Sound is reasonably balanced. Some sound and visual elements are distracting. Titles and credits were accurate but were usually illegible and/or did not effectively catch the viewer’s attention. Video is not well planned and has poor edits. Sound is of poor quality. Many sound and visual elements distract from the video’s message. Titles and/or credits were inaccurate or missing.